|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Collocation Peformance HistoryBelow in Table 1. is a collocation history based on PolyQuick LAGEOS analysis results by NASA/AlliedSignal Technical Services Group (ATSC). For a graphical representation of this results click here. For more detailed results (i.e. all satellites) from some of the more recent collocations (MLRO/MOBLAS 7, SALRO/MOBLAS 7, MLRS/TLRS-4), click on the appropriate hyperlink. Note: Please if you want to print the graphs set the printer page layout to landscape prior to printing. Collocation analysis is the process of comparing ranging data to the 1 millimeter (mm) level from two or more satellites laser ranging systems in close proximity (<600 meters, preferably <60 meters) by quasi-simultaneously ranging to common retro-reflector equipped satellite. There have been two primary collocation analysis tools, orbital and geometric. Both techniques have their strengths and weaknesses and can and should be used in tandem to compliment each other. The purely geometric technique, PolyQuick, was developed for NASA by ATSC, formerly Bendix Field Engineering Corporation (BFEC), in 1981. PolyQuick, in the mid 1980's, replaced the traditional orbital technique (e.g. GEODYN and UTOPIA) as the primary NASA collocation analysis tool. In the early collocations, only LAGEOS data was used for performance evaluation. Both of these techniques have been enhanced to eliminate non-overlapping periods of ranging and aggregating residuals from multi-arcs and satellites. Collocation analysis was and is still the best engineering tool available for rapid identification of sub-centimeter systematic error sources. SLR bias sources have been found in each sub-system of the SLR data chain (i.e. hardware, software, survey, operational procedures, meteorological sensing, epoch timing closure, data processing, and data analysis). The magnitude of the systematic biases have approximated the single shot LAGEOS Root Mean Square (RMS) precision. In the early 1980's, the NASA SLR systematic errors and single shot precisions were at the 50-100 mm level. In the mid to late 1980's, collocation analysis was used extensively to verfiy the NASA SLR system performance upgrades. These performance enhancements included an order of magnitude improvement in data precision, data accuracy, and bias stability. The system improvements resulted from SLR technological advances (e.g. micro channel plate photomultiplier tubes; low jitter discriminators; short-pulsed mode locked lasers; short and stable calibration targets; better calibration procedures; higher accuracy survey equipment and procedures; GPS receivers; and improved data reduction algorithms). By the late 1980's, the NASA MOBLAS and TLRS systems were consistently producing 10 mm LAGEOS single shot precisions with systematic errors at or below the 10 mm level.
Responsible Government Official: Carey Noll |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||